<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scottish Elections: The quality of debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leyton.org/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leyton.org/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/</link>
	<description>Thoughts. Comment. Opinion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SBR 30: Dodgy polls, dodgy leaflets and dodgy parties</title>
		<link>http://www.leyton.org/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-19773</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SBR 30: Dodgy polls, dodgy leaflets and dodgy parties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] there was no mid-week roundup, this is a bit long and some bloggers are featured more than once. As Richard Leyton says, the quality of debate is that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was no mid-week roundup, this is a bit long and some bloggers are featured more than once. As Richard Leyton says, the quality of debate is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalumCarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leyton.org/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-19746</link>
		<dc:creator>CalumCarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Guess you must be Richard.  I stumbled across your blog and was ready to comment when I glanced down the page and found that you compiled the Scottish Roundup No. 29 .  I hadn&#039;t heard of this either until last week when I was pleasantly surprised to note that you linked to one of my blogs - thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, back to this post.  My impression too is that the debate has been quite good.  I&#039;m not sure if it actually is better or if I&#039;m more aware of the detail because this time the result is in doubt and there is a chance of a major change.  Also, the fact that Blair will be going  - with a bloodied nose - has increased the interest of the UK nationals.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Guess you must be Richard.  I stumbled across your blog and was ready to comment when I glanced down the page and found that you compiled the Scottish Roundup No. 29 .  I hadn&#8217;t heard of this either until last week when I was pleasantly surprised to note that you linked to one of my blogs &#8211; thanks for that.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to this post.  My impression too is that the debate has been quite good.  I&#8217;m not sure if it actually is better or if I&#8217;m more aware of the detail because this time the result is in doubt and there is a chance of a major change.  Also, the fact that Blair will be going  &#8211; with a bloodied nose &#8211; has increased the interest of the UK nationals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
