<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scottish Elections: The quality of debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/</link>
	<description>Thoughts. Comment. Opinion.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SBR 30: Dodgy polls, dodgy leaflets and dodgy parties</title>
		<link>http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19773</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SBR 30: Dodgy polls, dodgy leaflets and dodgy parties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] there was no mid-week roundup, this is a bit long and some bloggers are featured more than once. As Richard Leyton says, the quality of debate is that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was no mid-week roundup, this is a bit long and some bloggers are featured more than once. As Richard Leyton says, the quality of debate is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalumCarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19746</link>
		<dc:creator>CalumCarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leyton.org/diary/2007/04/20/scottish-elections-the-quality-of-debate/#comment-19746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Guess you must be Richard.  I stumbled across your blog and was ready to comment when I glanced down the page and found that you compiled the Scottish Roundup No. 29 .  I hadn't heard of this either until last week when I was pleasantly surprised to note that you linked to one of my blogs - thanks for that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, back to this post.  My impression too is that the debate has been quite good.  I'm not sure if it actually is better or if I'm more aware of the detail because this time the result is in doubt and there is a chance of a major change.  Also, the fact that Blair will be going  - with a bloodied nose - has increased the interest of the UK nationals.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Guess you must be Richard.  I stumbled across your blog and was ready to comment when I glanced down the page and found that you compiled the Scottish Roundup No. 29 .  I hadn&#8217;t heard of this either until last week when I was pleasantly surprised to note that you linked to one of my blogs - thanks for that.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to this post.  My impression too is that the debate has been quite good.  I&#8217;m not sure if it actually is better or if I&#8217;m more aware of the detail because this time the result is in doubt and there is a chance of a major change.  Also, the fact that Blair will be going  - with a bloodied nose - has increased the interest of the UK nationals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
